internetmarketingtree.blogg.se

Difference between civ v and civ v complete
Difference between civ v and civ v complete











difference between civ v and civ v complete difference between civ v and civ v complete

<- I tend to disagree with this one, as the early map trading was (as Sulla admits) unrealistic, resulting in potentially knowing the whole world in 1000 BC. The change to move map trading to the Middle Ages in Conquests negatively affecting balance and AIs. Feudalism and especially Fascism making the game worse, especially fascism due to the AI's tendencies to wind up in it late game and implode spectacularly as a result (and more quickly than the Vanilla/PTW Communism implosion). <- I'm curious how many people use these in practice.

#Difference between civ v and civ v complete how to#

Conquests adds Civil Engineers and Policemen, which the AI doesn't know how to use, further buffing humans. The Status of Zeus making a civ that's lucky enough to have Ivory massively overpowered Armies, both what I mentioned above and that the buffs to them in Conquests made them unbalanced in the hands of a human Science leaders (which are actually broken, though Sulla didn't know that) Bombardment always hitting units first in cities, rather than a 1/3 chance to hit units as in PTW, making artillery too powerful, and weakening the AI (who rarely/never bombards cities) versus the human. Airplane range doubling making airplanes too powerful Lethal bombardment making airplanes too powerful One of the people who prefers Conquests could probably chime in with some additional reasons.Įdit: Found Sulla's article about this topic: Additional reasons include: I've done that occasionally when I feel like playing a GOTM, but the Conquests one is too difficult for me. There also is a PTW-based Game of the Month concurrent with the Conquests one, so you may wish to play PTW to play that GOTM. In PTW, armies don't add movement, so the AI uses them more effectively, making a more challenging game. if they add a Cavalry, they'll only subsequently add a unit that has 4 movement, which doesn't exist in the base game. One reason that I can recall off the top of my head is that the AI is more competent at using armies in PTW in Conquests an Army boosts movement by 1, and the AI only adds units that have the same movement as the army, so e.g. There are a few people who prefer PTW to Conquests.













Difference between civ v and civ v complete